Having read the difference between the concepts of incrementalism and rational choice, which sounds more reasonable to you? While all government actors certainly hope to reach an optimal outcome, is it more often the case that policy outcomes are optimal or incremental in nature? Give an example. 2. As with the previous section, how does Henry define the other remaining models: the Public Goods and Services Model and the Technology Assessment and Forecasting Model? 3. With respect to the public goods and services model, how do exclusion and consumption function? What is the difference between a private versus common-pool good or service? Can you give an example of each? 1. Is the Strategic Planning Paradigm the best alternative to incrementalism and rationalism or is it really an application of the latter two? Please elaborate on your view. 2. Henry notes that ″regrettably… many public strategic plans have been written, at high cost, only to collect dust on many shelves.″ Why do you think this is so? Is there a way to avoid this, in your opinion?
