discuss other parts of either Canon′s rhetoric – think of the questions as a guide, as a way to get started. What is Doherty′s overall opinion of Canon′s argument, and how is that opinion supported? Do you agree – why or why not? How does Doherty′s opening work to introduce Canon′s argument and context? Did it prepare you for the rest of the analysis or was something missing? What was the most insightful part of the analysis – what surprised you, if anything, and what would you like to imitate in your own rhetorical analysis essay? How did Doherty introduce, explain, and assess Canon′s use of rhetorical appeals? Do you agree, and was there anything else Doherty might have discussed? Did the analysis help you understand Canon′s argument better? Did it change your mind at all about the subject or debate?
