provide a summary, comparison of the cases, and analysis of how these cases may affect operations at for-profit institutions of higher education. US ex rel. Hendow v. University of Phoenix, 461F. 3d 1166, (9th Cir. 2006) US ex rel. Hoggett v. University of Phoenix, Dist. Court, (E.D. Cal. 2014) Washington v. Education Management Corp. et al., 871 F.Supp.2d 433, (W.D. Pa. 2012) “For-Profit College to Pay $95.5 Million to Settle Claims of Illegal Recruiting, Consumer Fraud, and Other Violations” (U.S. Department of Justice Office of Public Affairs Release dated Monday, November 16, 2015) In Section 2, provide a summary and analysis of US Senator Tom Harkin’s 2012 report For Profit Higher Education: The Failure to Safeguard the Federal Investment and Ensure Student Success. 1) Read the Executive Summary from “Part I: Majority Final Report on For-Profit Higher Education” (approximately 10 pages) 2) Read the individual profiles in “Part II: Profiles of 30 For-Profit Education Companies” of: 1) Apollo Group, Inc. 2) Grand Canyon Education, Inc. 3) National American University 4) Education Management Corporation Write an analysis that answers the following questions: Compare and contrast the reviews of the four institutions. Which insitutions fare better in the report, and why? What were the most scathing remarks made about for-profit education institutions as a whole and for each of the four institutions or corporations individually? What were the positive remarks made about for-profit education institutions as a whole and for each of the four institutions or corporations individually?
