Assuming that you are not a rationalist, and don’t accept Descartes’ theory that all sense experience can be open to doubt, construct an argument after Locke that shows that your perception of your car or your room is not subject to any universal doubt. Does the color of your car really exist in the car, according to Locke?

Assuming that you are not a rationalist, and don’t accept Descartes’ theory that all sense experience can be open to doubt, construct an argument after Locke that shows that your perception of your car or your room is not subject to any universal doubt. Does the color of your car really exist in the car, according to Locke? Does your room exist when you are not in it?