Read the factual assumptions raised (both);
b) identify the possible (potential) international crimes in each one of them (point out fact and applicable article)
c) explain why you believe that in each identified fact the requirements demanded by the type are met (argue why that would be a constitutive act of the international crime that you have identified)
d) Justify why you think the ICC [is / is not] competent for that situation (indicate the article and the reason for choosing that article) since what I will evolve will be the “reasoning” under which you come to the conclusion that The particular facts that you have identified are constitutive of a certain crime. For this it is important to know which is the main characteristic of each behavior to be considered a crime (for example, in genocide the group and intentionality + subtype, in CLH the contextual element + subtype and in CG the existence of an armed conflict + subtype. ..) and then justify why in each specific case it is fulfilled.
For the issue of competition more or less the same .. If the ICC is occult or there is some reason that prevents it
