Why do upper socioeconomic status and lower socioeconomic status class individuals behave unethically?

Why do upper socioeconomic status and lower socioeconomic status class individuals behave unethically?Social class, or socioeconomic status refers to an individual’s rank vis-s-vis others in society in terms of wealth, occupational prestige, and education (Piff, Stancato, Cote, Medoza-Denton, Keltner, 2013). When a person is in the upper class of socioeconomic status those individuals believe that they are entitled to something. (I am not saying all upper socioeconomic status individuals act like this, but the majority do). Lower socioeconomic status individuals feel as though they have to help one another, and if breaking a few rules will help them, then why not? Ethics is brought up here. Research shows that the pursuit of self-interest is more fundamental motive among society’s elite, and the increased want associated with greater wealth and status can promote wrongdoing, and this was found not only for the elite status, but as well as the lower socioeconomic status (Piff, Stancato, Cote, Medoza-Denton, Keltner, 2013). This is not saying that the middle class of socioeconomic status does not have their downfalls either, but what good would it do for them? Many middle class socioeconomic status individuals have lived in all three realms of the socioeconomic status classes and have found a middle ground where breaking rules is not as necessary.

According to traditional Keynesian economic theory, how should governments respond to recession? Why? 

1. Reisch (2014/17) argues that social policy can be divided into three categories: social welfare policy, fiscal welfare policy, and occupational welfare policy.

a. Briefly describe the three categories of social policy – providing an example of each.

b. Explain how such a categorization can be seen as, in the words of Richard Timuss, “social division of welfare.”

2. Blau (2014/17) argues that there are five significant features of the contemporary U.S. economy that provide the context for social policy.

a. Briefly describe each.

b. Describe how at least one of these features of the U.S. economy (or one of the others discussed in class) shapes the policy milieu of your practice of social work and/or your clients’ lives.’

3. Blau (2014/17) articulates “Three Conservative Myths about Social Welfare and the Economy.” Discuss one – summarizing Blau’s argument for why it is a myth. If you disagree with Blau, say why you do and provide evidence for your view. If you agree, say why it is important to understand and debunk the myth.

4. Blau (2014/17) and Schiele (2014/17) argue that social policies and programs not only provide basic necessities to marginalized people and communities, but also serve to regulate both the economy and the lives of people of color in ways that promote the dominant paradigm. Choose a sector of the economy – e.g., housing, food, health care and describe how social welfare programs/policies (a) boost profits in that sector and (b) regulate the lives of people of color? (You might also find that Coates [2014] and Willse [2010] have useful contributions to this subject.)

5. Reisch (2014/17) and Warde (2017) identify key features of the Elizabethan Poor Laws and those that followed in the early United States (e.g., reforms articulated in the Report of the Committee on Pauper Laws). Articulate briefly five of these features and how their remnants can be seen in current social welfare policy.

6. Roll (2014/17) articulates various social changes that led to changes both in women’s relationship to the economy and in societal view of gender roles. Discuss the relationship you see among two or more of these changes – or how Roll’s analysis is lacking.

7. Reisch (2014/17) articulates seven stages of policy development. Briefly describe them.

8. Collins (2007) discusses three dimensions of oppression – the institutional, the symbolic, and the individual. Briefly describe each, as well as how you see them in the context of social welfare policy (e.g., in formation, implementation, evaluation).

9. Explain a policy that may have had unintended consequences, and explain why that may have happened. What can we do to try to avoid such consequences?

10. Caputo (2014/17) notes: “Structuring problems is an important activity for policy analysts,” for the way that we define a problem will dictate, in part, the solutions we consider. Pick a social problem, and define the issue in two different ways, showing how various articulations of the issue lead to disparate solutions. (You might also find that Coates [2014] and Willse [2010] have useful contributions to this subject. Reisch [2014/17] also discusses the social construction of social problems.)

11. Briefly describe the following concepts – and provide an example of the concept applied in the context of policy analysis:

a. Universal benefit

b. Means-tested (or selective) benefit

c. Population-at-risk

d. Inclusiveness of coverage

e. Horizontal adequacy

f. Vertical adequacy

g. Horizontal equity

h. Vertical equity

12. Why, if the U.S. federal income tax is progressive, is the total share of taxes that will be paid across the economic spectrum roughly equal to their total share of income – i.e., proportional to the income they capture? (For example, the richest one percent of Americans pay 23.7% of total taxes and receive 21.6% of total income, while the poorest one-fifth of Americans pay 2.1% of total taxes and receive 3.3% of total income.) In answering this question, you should define and discuss progressive taxes, regressive taxes, tax expenditures, and marginal and effective tax rates – and provide examples of each.

13. Different economic theories suggest different responses to periodic economic crises.

a. According to traditional Keynesian economic theory, how should governments respond to recession? Why?

b. According to supply-side economic theory, how should governments respond to recession? Why?

c. How would Marxist theorists critique both Keynesian and supply-side theory?

14. Two trends within the past 50 years have increasingly moved the authority and implementation of social welfare policy away from the federal government.

a. What is policy devolution? Provide an example.

b. What is privatization? Provide an example.

c. Why should we care?

15. Describe the difference between mandatory and discretionary spending – and why is the distinction important?

16. Put the following steps of the legislative process in the correct order. For the italicized steps, describe how you might advocate effectively for the bill at this step. (Who are the targets of your advocacy? What might you do?)

a. The Finance Committee considers amendments to House Bill 1 that were raised during its hearing.

b. House Bill 1 crosses over to the other chamber for consideration.

c. House Bill 1 passes second reading in the Senate with amendments.

d. The full Senate debates House Bill 1 and considers amendments to the bill.

e. The full House of Delegates debates House Bill 1 and considers amendments to the bill.

f. The Finance Committee holds a hearing on House Bill 1.

g. House Bill 1 passes third reader in the House of Delegates.

h. The bill becomes law.

i. The Economic Matters Committee holds a hearing on House Bill 1.

j. Both the full membership of House and the Senate vote favorably on the conference report – the comprise version – of House Bill 1.

k. House Bill 1 is drafted by the Department of Legislative Services

l. The governor signs the bill.

m. House Bill 1 passes second reading in the House of Delegates without amendments.

n. The Finance Committee votes favorably on House Bill 1 – with amendments.

o. House Bill 1 passes third reader in the Senate.

p. House Bill 1 – without the possibility of amendments – is debated by and receives approval from a majority of the membership in a floor vote in the House of Delegates.

q. House Bill 1 is introduced in the Senate, where it has its first reading and is referred to the Finance Committee.

r. The Economic Matters Committee votes favorably on House Bill 1.

s. The governor considers the bill for signature or veto.

t. House Bill 1 is introduced in the House of Delegates, where it has its first reading and is referred to the Economic Matters Committee.

u. A conference committee – which includes three delegates and three senators – is appointed to draft a compromise bill.

v. House Bill 1 – without the possibility of additional amendments – is debated by and receives approval from a majority of the membership in a floor vote in the Senate.

17. Why are social workers – including and especially those who engage in direct practice – well positioned to be effective advocates for policy change?

E. What grade would you give yourself for engagement in the learning process of this course – including your preparation for and engagement in class? How might you and/or I improve your learning during the second half of the semester?

What other devices might not be allowed in certain facilities, and why would they be restricted?

Some organizations prohibit workers from bringing certain kinds of devices into the workplace, such as cameras, cell phones, and USB drives. Some businesses require employees to use clear or see-through backpacks when carrying personal items. What other devices might not be allowed in certain facilities, and why would they be restricted?

Discuss at least 2 issues identified, such as healthcare providers’ issues (physicians, nurses, and other users).

Research recent (within the last 5 years) Electronic Health Records (EHR) implementation issues by searching online or within the Rasmussen library. Discuss at least 2 issues identified, such as healthcare providers’ issues (physicians, nurses, and other users). Explain the challenges. How could these be mitigated? What do you think should be done? Reflect from your own experiences if you have encountered challenges, either professionally or as a patient, with EHR.

Discuss the Impact of Social Policy.

The Impact of Social Policy

Social policies can have a significant impact on individuals and families, as well as the organizations and agencies that implement the policies. In some cases, the policy, as written, appears comprehensive and effective. Yet, despite appearances, the policy might fail to be effective as a result of improper implementation, interpretation, and/or application of the policy. As a social worker, how might you reduce the potential negative impact faulty social policies might have on organizations and agencies, as well as the populations you serve?

For this Discussion, review this week’s resources, including cases “Working with Immigrants and Refugees: The Case of Luisa” and “Social Work Policy: Benefit Administration and Provision.” Then, select either of the cases and consider how the social welfare policies presented in the case influenced the problems facing Luisa or Tessa. Finally, think about how policies affect social agencies and how social workers work with clients such as Tessa or Luisa.

By Day 3

Post an explanation of the effects of the social welfare policies presented in the case study you selected on Luisa or Tessa. Be specific and reference the case study you selected in your post. Finally, explain how policies affect social agencies and how social workers work with clients, such as Tessa or Luisa.

References (use 2 or more)

Plummer, S.-B., Makris, S., & Brocksen, S. (Eds.). (2014). Social work case studies: Foundation year. Baltimore: MD: Laureate International Universities Publishing. [Vital Source e-reader].

Popple, P. R., & Leighninger, L. (2015). The policy-based profession: An introduction to social welfare policy analysis for social workers. (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. (2011). Policy basics: Introduction to the federal budget process. Retrieved from www.cbpp.org/files/3-7-03bud.pdf

Working With Immigrants and Refugees: The Case of Luisa

Luisa is a 36-year-old, married, Latino female who immigrated to the United States from Colombia. She speaks only Spanish, so a translator must be used for communication. She came to the United States on a visa, but remained beyond the allotted time. While in the United States, she met and married Hugo, who was in the country with documentation. Once Luisa married Hugo, she became pregnant with a daughter, who is now 3 years old.

Luisa has a 10-year-old son named Juan in Colombia. Luisa has always had the desire to reunite with Juan and bring him to the United States to live with her. After her marriage and status change, she began the process of sponsoring Juan. She has been advised that in order for sponsorship to be achieved, she cannot receive welfare benefits because she needs to prove that she can support herself and her child.

Luisa came to the local welfare agency after she and her daughter entered the domestic violence shelter. She reported that Hugo had a history of violence, which was exacerbated when he drank alcohol. Hugo had been drinking more frequently, and the episodes of violence had increased in severity. The domestic violence program requires all residents to apply for any available benefits in order to remain enrolled in their services.

In one particular episode, Hugo almost fractured her orbital bones. She had extensive facial bruising and blood pooled in one eye. Luisa is quite fearful of Hugo. She is also financially dependent on him. She is reluctant to apply for benefits because she fears that this will compromise her ability to sponsor her son in Colombia. She is tearful and tells me that she cannot sacrifice her son’s opportunity to come to the United States.

Luisa is socially isolated because she has no family in the United States, and Hugo has restricted her ability to socialize and establish friendships. However, she is a practicing Catholic and does belong to a church that offers bilingual services.

Luisa began to discuss returning to Hugo because she felt that this was her only viable option. I advised her that under the new federal changes in immigration laws she might be allowed to apply for benefits and still sponsor her son because she is experiencing domestic violence. I explained that we would need to speak to an immigration lawyer to verify this, but it could possibly be an alternative to returning to Hugo.

Luisa reported that she had given money to lawyers in the past who had been unhelpful. She was suspicious of the law’s ability to protect her. Hugo had also threatened to report her to the authorities, stating that he would tell them she only married him to remain in the country. Although this is not true, she feared that he would do this, and she would never see her daughter again.

I offered to speak with someone at the domestic violence program and advocate that they allow her some time to research her options. I told Luisa that these were difficult decisions to make and that she would be supported in her decision. I told her that she knew what was best for her family. I offered to research the options that she might have under this new federal program. I also asked for permission to contact the priest at her church so that she might be able to review her situation with a religious leader in the community. Luisa agreed.

Two weeks later, Luisa applied for services on behalf of her daughter and herself. She has decided not to return to Hugo.