Read “The Use of Force” by William Carlos Williams in Ch. 33~ page 2153-2156 (in Robert DiYanni sixth edition Literature: reading fiction, poetry, and drama) -Write your Immediate first person narrative reaction

Read “The Use of Force” by William Carlos Williams in Ch. 33~ page 2153-2156 (in Robert DiYanni sixth edition Literature: reading fiction, poetry, and drama)
-Write your Immediate first person narrative reaction

what emotions do it if provoked a new? How did you feel about the doctor? The patient? The setting? What surprised you? What made you laugh or annoyed you? What is your gut reaction to this story?

Describe the Anatomy of Peace

the Anatomy of Peace

I. General Instructions Abstract pages is needed! A. Choose a conflict that you have experienced or observed within an organization of your choice. The conflict can be one that is already resolved, or one that is ongoing. The chosen conflict can be at the personal, group, organizational, or inter-organizational level. Note: Situations that are very personal, or are still emotional, tend to not work well for this assignment because it is difficult to remain objective and analytical. B. Analyze the conflict using the Arbinger Diagrams. Analyze both sides of the conflict. Explain the conflict in terms of the diagrams. The diagrams can be found in the book The Anatomy of Peace. (The diagrams can be drawn free hand in the paper). C. In the paper, do not use people’s names. Say something like, “A boss I once had, who I will call Jon.” If a workplace is involved, you do not need to name the firm, but please specify the industry to give context. Example: “Several years ago I worked as Customer Service Representative in a large firm in the electronic manufacturing industry…” II. Paper Format Note: The paper should use a complete set of Arbinger diagrams to explain the situation. The set includes the Way of Being diagram, the Choice and Collusion diagrams, the “Choosing War” sets of boxes in Ch. 12 and 13 (four of them) and the Influence Pyramid. All of the diagrams are explained more fully in the addendum to the book. Put the appropriate diagrams in each section of the paper, or put them all in an addendum – whichever works best for you. The diagrams can be drawn free hand. A. Introduction and “Way of Being” diagram. This section should describe what the conflict is about – over what and between whom. Use the following elements (found in Mayer, Ch. 1): Nature of the conflict (dimensions, duration, involved parties, etc.), organizational environment of the conflict, brief history of the conflict, chronology of events. Include a “Way of Being” diagram. 7 B. Causes and patterns of conflict – “Choice diagram” “Collusion diagram.” Outline the causes/sources of your chosen conflict by showing where the involved actors were on both sides of the Choice and Collusion diagrams. Explain the diagrams thoroughly in terms of the chosen conflict. Do not describe the book – both of us have read it. Rather, explain why you applied the diagrams in the book to the conflict in the way you did. C. Choosing war – “In the Box.” Next, move to the four “Boxes.” Discuss all four of the boxes but focus on the main one or two that this conflict affects. Which set of boxes were the involved actors in (both sides), and how did this affect the origination, development and resolution of the conflict? Explain your thoughts. D. Recovering Inner Clarity and Peace: Getting out of the Box. Chapter 20 discusses the four steps in the Arbinger process of getting out of the box. If the conflict is resolved, explain the processes and outcomes of the resolution in terms of the steps. If it is not resolved, or could have been resolved better, discuss what could or should happen to affect the resolution at each step. E. Conclusions. Fill out the Influence Pyramid in terms of this situation.